Nike Huarache Black And White
of Med. Assistance, 439 Mass.
1, 6 (2003); Commerce Ins. Co. v. Commissioner of Ins. , 447 Mass. 478, 481 (2006) (questions of statutory construction [and by analogy the interpretation of administrative regulations] receive de novo review). See also Anastos v. Sable, 443 Mass. 146, 149 (2004) (unrestrained review will apply to legal conclusions). The first provision of our concern, 982. 551, sets out obligations of a participant family. Section 982. 551(l) addresses the duty to refrain from criminal conduct (emphasis supplied):by household members. The members of the household may not engage in drug related criminal activity or violent criminal activity or other criminal activity that threatens the health, safety or right Nike Huarache Sale
if the PHA determines that any household member has violated the family obligation under 982. 551 not to engage in violent criminal activity. She concluded that the cross references amounted to specific language superseding general terms, and that they narrowed the meaning of criminal activity that threatens the health, safety or right to peaceful enjoyment of other residents and persons residing in the immediate vicinity ( 982. 551) and criminal violation of family obligations ( 982. 552) to the category of criminal activity contemplated in 982. 553. For multiple reasons this interpretation of the regulations does not withstand analysis. We construe administrative rules under the same canons guiding statutory construction. See Warcewicz v. Department of Envtl. Protection, 410 Mass. 548, 550 (1991); Figueroa v. Director of Dept. of Labor Workforce Dev. , 54 Mass. App. Ct. 64, 70 (2002). Those guideposts point strongly against such a restrictive interpretation of the grounds for termination.
First, as the judge observed, specific lan.
erm of probationary conditions through March 1, 2006. Discussion. 1. Standard of review. In review of a grant of summary judgment, the appellate court examines the factual materials in the light most favorable to the losing party and determines the correctness of the law applied to them. See Augat, Inc. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. , 410 Mass. 117, 120 (1991). It works de novo from the same record as the motion judge. See Matthews v. Ocean Spray Cranberries, Inc. , 426 Mass. 122, 123 n. 1 (1997). In this instance the material facts are undisputed. Center v. Commissioner of the Div. Nike Huarache All Blue
to peaceful enjoyment of other residents and persons residing in the immediate vicinity of the premises (see 982. 553). Section 982. 522(c)(1)(i) reads as follows (emphasis supplied):Grounds for denial or termination of assistance. The PHA may at any Nike Huarache Black And White time . . . terminate program assistance for a participant, for any of the following grounds:If the family violates any family obligations under the program (see 982. 551).
See 982. 553 concerning denial or termination of assistance for crime by family members. Subsections (b)(1) and (2) include the following text:assistance for other criminals. The PHA must establish standards that allow the PHA to terminate assistance under the program for a family Air Max 95 2014
Nike Huarache Black And White
Home / Nike Huarache Black And White
Nike Air Force High Tops Black
Nike Air Force Duck Camo
Nike Huarache Mint Green
Air Max Blue And White
Nike Huarache Grey And Black
Nike Air Force Black Suede
Nike Air Force Combat
Nike Air Force Gold
Air Max 2013 Vs 2014
Nike Huarache Yellow And Blue